|
Parents and the School-to-Work Transition of Special Needs Youthby Bettina A. Lankard; ERIC Digest #142. |
CreditsSourceERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational EducationContentsConditions That Necessitate Transition ServicesLaws That Mandate Transition Assistance Parents' Desire for Involvement Multidisciplinary Teams for Transition Planning Collaborative Consultation for Problem Solving References ForumsLearning and Other DisabilitiesRelated ArticlesParenting A Child With Special Needs: A Guide To Readings And ResourcesIndividualized Education Programs |
The school-to-work transition of the nation's youth has been
a major focus of vocational education efforts for the past
decade. Educators help students identify their interests and
abilities, engage in career education and career development
activities, and develop individual education plans. Although
these activities are significant, their comprehensiveness and
effectiveness are limited by staff and time. "The ratio of
students to counselors in public high schools is almost 300 to 1;
and school guidance counselors are able to spend less than one
hour of every five on career counseling" (Otto 1989, p. 161).
Add to this the unique and complicated counseling needs of
students with disabilities and it becomes apparent that other
actors, primarily parents, must be included in the school-to-work
transition of youth.
Will defines transition as "an outcome-oriented process encompassing a broad array of services and experiences that lead to employment" (Friedenberg et al. 1993, p. 235). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 1990 defines transition services as "a coordinated set of activities for a student, designed within an outcome-oriented process, which promotes movement from school to post-school activities, including postsecondary education, vocational training, integrated employment (including supported employment), continuing and adult education, adult services, independent living, or community participation" (ibid.). This ERIC DIGEST looks at the challenges of effecting successful transitions, particularly for students with disabilities, and parents' roles in the transition process. Conditions That Necessitate Transition ServicesPart of the dilemma faced by students at the turn of this century is the changing occupational scene: countless occupational possibilities and a wide variety of career preparation options. Students, educators, and parents have difficulty keeping abreast of new and emerging occupations as well as those that have become obsolete. For students with disabilities, the challenge of career selection and work preparation is even greater. These youth and their parents must be knowledgeable about vocational opportunities and program requirements as well as the community services and other benefits available to them by law. Back to the Table of ContentsLaws That Mandate Transition AssistanceFederal legislation has mandated certain policies to ensure transition assistance for students with disabilities. The IDEA promotes the development of the "Individualized Transition Plan for students 14 years of age and older, which focuses on community-referenced learning, to help prepare students for adult roles in their communities" (Smith and Lauritzen 1992-93, p. 16). The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) applies "'a new access doctrine' to all aspects of the lives of individuals with disabilities, not just the school years" (ibid.). This act represents a commitment to students with disabilities to provide for them "the fullest opportunity, and support to fulfill the typical roles in society." Although these laws provide direction, all stakeholders in the education of students with disabilities must be knowledgeable about them, monitoring their interpretation and implementation in the community. Back to the Table of ContentsParents' Desire for InvolvementOther legislation delineates parental involvement at various points during transition: P.L. 94-142, which "mandates that assessment information be gathered from a variety of sources, including parents" (ibid., p. 140) and P.L. 98-524, which "requires provision of counseling services designed to facilitate transitions from school to post-school employment and career opportunities" (ibid., p. 141). Research shows, however, that parents have little involvement in transition planning, despite the fact that they have a critical role to play and a major interest in assuming that role (McNair and Rusch 1990). A survey of 200 families of students with disabilities found that parents were significantly less involved in transition programs than they desired (ibid., p. 10):
"Lack of parent participation and involvement may be detrimental to the achievement of successful transition outcomes" (Johnson and Rusch 1993, p. 6).Back to the Table of Contents |
|
Multidisciplinary Teams for Transition PlanningIt appears that many parents are left out of the transition planning process for their children with disabilities. Multidisciplinary transition planning teams--whose core members include parent(s) or guardian, along with the teacher, student, and a staff member appointed to coordinate the transition planning process--are one way of bringing parents into the mainstream of the transition process (O'Neill et al. 1990). The benefit of having parents serve on interdisciplinary teams is that they can help teachers pinpoint the specific skills needed by their children. They can also offer their perspectives on the effectiveness of the delivery system given their experience with it. The testimony of parents and consumers regarding benefits and pitfalls of the system provide valuable insight to parents with less experience and to other members of the team. Izzo and Shumate (1991) cite the following rationale for involving parents in the transition process:
Some of the activities in which parents can engage to support their children's transitions include organizing to ensure political pressure and compliance with the law, sharing information on the ADA, monitoring the hiring practices of employers, ensuring access to public accommodations, and filing formal complaints if necessary (Smith and Lauritzen 1992-93). Parents should also be active in collaborating on school curriculum to ensure that their children will have appropriate options available to them when they leave school. O'Neill et al. (1990) present the following recommendations:
Collaborative Consultation for Problem SolvingAlthough transition planning is enhanced by the combined efforts of a multidisciplinary and interagency teams, collaborative consultation is effective in solving problems parents and students encounter in making school and work transitions. Collaborative consultation is a "model in which the teacher-consultant and the parent-consultee cooperatively solve problems through their shared expertise" (Elksnin and Elksnin 1990, p. 2). In the collaborative consultation arrangement, teachers and parents are co-equals recognizing the expertise each brings to the planning. "Opportunities for implementing collaboration include consultation sessions designed to inform parents of vocational opportunities, plan vocational assessment and collect vocationally-relevant information, develop the vocational component of the individualized education plan, and develop plans for transitions from school to employment or postsecondary training" (ibid.). The collaborative consultation process can help teachers and parents meet the mandates of P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 98-524.
Motivation is the key factor driving parents to become involved in the school-to-work transitions of their children with disabilities. The intense desire many parents share--to help their children succeed in school, work, and community living--is a powerful force prompting them to develop the skills they need to coordinate programs and services for their children. Through a variety of interactions with the many individuals involved in transitions, parents have the potential to serve as a primary force in coordinating the activities involved in effecting successful school-to-work transition. Back to the Table of ContentsReferencesElksnin, L., and Elksnin, N. "Using Collaborative Consultation with Parents to Promote Effective Vocational Programming." Career Development for Exceptional Individuals 13, no. 1 (Fall 1990): 135-141.Everson, J. M.; Rachal, P.; and Michael, M. G. Interagency Collaboration for Young Adults with Deaf-blindness: Toward a Common Transition Goal. Sands Point, NY: Technical Assistance Center, Helen Keller National Center, 1992. (ED 345 456) Friedenberg, J. E.; Izzo, M. V.; and Cartledge, G. Serving Vocational Students with Disabilities: a Vocational and Special Education Curriculum for Infusion. Columbus: Center on Education and Training for Employment, The Ohio State University, 1993. Izzo, M. V., and Shumate, K. Network for Effective Transitions to Work: a Transition Coordinator's Handbook. Columbus: Center on Education and Training for Employment, The Ohio State University, 1991. (ED 332 033) Johnson, J. R., and Rusch, F. R. "Secondary Special Education and Transition Services." Career Development for Exceptional Individuals 16, no. 1 (Spring 1993): 1-18. McNair, J., and Rusch, F. R. "Parent Involvement in Transition Programs." In Research in Secondary Special Education And Transitional Employment, compiled by F. R. Rusch. Champaign: University of Illinois, 1990. (ED 331 228) O'Neill, J.; Gothelef, C.; Choen, S.; Lehman, L.; and Woolf, S. A Curriculum Approach to Support the Transition to Adulthood Of Adolescents with Visual or Dual Sensory Impairments and Cognitive Disabilities. New York: Hunter College of the City University of New York, 1990. Otto, L. B. How to Help Your Child Choose a Career. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Education, 1989. (ED 336 506)
Smith, P. M., and Lauritzen, A. M. "Claiming the Promise: Parents and the ADA." Impact 5, no. 4 (Winter 1992-93): 16. Back to the Table of ContentsCreditsFor More Information Contact:
ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education Developed with funding from the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, under Contract No. RR93002001. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the position or policies of OERI or the Department. DIGESTS may be freely reproduced. Back to the Top |