What Are The Social-Emotional Needs Of Gifted Children?
To a large degree, the needs of gifted children are the same as those
of other
children. The same developmental stages occur, though often at a younger age
(Webb & Kleine, 1993). Gifted children may face the same potentially
limiting
problems, such as family poverty, substance abuse, or alcoholism. Some needs
and problems, however, appear more often among gifted children.
Types Of Problems
It is helpful to conceptualize needs of gifted children
in terms of those that arise because of the interaction
with the environmental setting (e.g., family, school,
or cultural milieu) and those that arise internally
because of the very characteristics of the gifted child.
Several intellectual and personality attributes
characterize gifted children and should be noted at the
outset. These characteristics may be strengths, but
potential problems also may be associated with them
(Clark, 1992; Seagoe, 1974).
Some particularly common characteristics are shown in the table.
Possible Problems That May Be Associated With
Characteristic Strengths Of Gifted Children
|
Strengths | Possible Problems |
|
Acquires/retains information quickly | Impatient with others;
dislikes basic routine. |
|
Inquisitive;searches for significance. | Asks embarrassing questions;
excessive in interests. |
|
Intrinsic motivation. | Strong-willed; resists direction. |
|
Enjoys problem-solving; able to conceptualize,questions teaching procedures.
abstract, synthesize. | Resists routine practice; |
|
Seeks cause-effect relations. | Dislikes unclear/illogical areas
(e.g., traditions or feelings). |
|
Emphasizes truth, equity,and fair play. | Worries about
humanitarian concerns. |
|
Seeks to organize things and people. | Constructs complicated rules;
often seen as bossy. |
|
Large facile vocabulary; advanced, broad information. | May use
words to manipulate;
bored with school and age-peers. |
|
High expectations of self and others. | Intolerant, perfectionistic;
may become depressed. |
|
Creative/inventive; likes new ways of doing things. | May be seen as
disruptive and out of step. |
|
Intense concentration;long attention span and persistence in areas of
interest. | Neglects duties or people
during periods of focus; resists interruption; stubbornness. |
|
Sensitivity, empathy; desire to be accepted by others. |
Sensitivity to criticism
or peer rejection. |
|
High energy, alertness,eagerness. | Frustration with inactivity;
may be seen as hyperactive. |
|
Independent; prefers individualized work; reliant input; nonconformity.
| May reject parent
or peer on self. |
|
Diverse interests and abilities; versatility | May appear
disorganized or
scattered; frustrated over lack of time. |
|
Strong sense of humor. | Peers may misunderstand humor; may
become "class clown"for
attention. |
Adapted from Clark (1992) and Seagoe (1974).
Back to the Table of Contents
These characteristics are seldom inherently problematic by themselves.
More
often, combinations of these characteristics lead to behavior patterns
such as:
Uneven Development. Motor skills, especially
fine-motor, often lag behind cognitive conceptual
abilities, particularly in preschool gifted children
(Webb & Kleine, 1993). These children may see in their
"mind's eye" what they want to do, construct, or draw;
however, motor skills do not allow them to achieve the
goal. Intense frustration and emotional outbursts may
result.
Peer Relations. As preschoolers and in primary grades,
gifted children (particularly highly gifted) attempt
to organize people and things. Their search for
consistency emphasizes "rules," which they attempt to
apply to others. They invent complex games and try to
organize their playmates, often prompting resentment
in their peers.
Excessive Self-Criticism. The ability to see
possibilities and alternatives may imply that
youngsters see idealistic images of what they might be,
and simultaneously berate themselves because they see
how they are falling short of an ideal
(Adderholt-Elliott, 1989; Powell & Haden, 1984;
Whitmore, 1980).
Perfectionism. The ability to see how one might ideally
perform, combined with emotional intensity, leads many
gifted children to unrealistically high expectations
of themselves. In high ability children, perhaps 15-20%
may be hindered significantly by perfectionism at some
point in their academic careers, and even later in life.
Avoidance of Risk-Taking. In the same way the gifted
youngsters see the possibilities, they also see
potential problems in undertaking those activities.
Avoidance of potential problems can mean avoidance of
risk-taking, and may result in underachievement
(Whitmore, 1980).
Multipotentiality. Gifted children often have several
advanced capabilities and may be involved in diverse
activities to an almost frantic degree. Though seldom a
problem for the child, this may create problems for the
family, as well as quandaries when decisions must be
about career selection (Kerr, 1985; 1991).
Gifted Children with Disabilities. Physical
disabilities can prompt social and emotional
difficulties. Intellect may be high, but motor
difficulties such as cerebral palsy may prevent
expression of potential. Visual or hearing impairment
or a learning disability may cause frustration. Gifted
children with disabilities tend to evaluate themselves
more on what they are unable to do than on their
substantial abilities (Whitmore & Maker, 1985).
Back to the Table of Contents
Problems From Outside Sources
Lack of understanding or support for gifted children,
and sometimes actual ambivalence or hostility, creates
significant problems (Webb & Kleine, 1993). Some common
problem patterns are:
School Culture and Norms. Gifted children, by
definition, are "unusual" when compared with same-age
children--at least in cognitive abilities--and
require different educational experiences (Kleine &
Webb, 1992). Schools, however, generally group
children by age. The child often has a dilemma--conform
to the expectations for the average child or be seen as
nonconformist.
Expectations by Others. Gifted
children--particularly the more creative--do not
conform. Nonconformists violate or challenge
traditions, rituals, roles, or expectations. Such
behaviors often prompt discomfort in others. The gifted
child, sensitive to others' discomfort, may then try to
hide abilities.
Peer Relations. Who is a peer for a gifted child? Gifted
children need several peer groups because their
interests are so varied. Their advanced levels of
ability may steer them toward older children. They may
choose peers by reading books (Halsted, 1994). Such
children are often thought of as "loners." The conflict
between fitting in and being an individual may be quite
stressful.
Depression. Depression is usually being angry at
oneself or at a situation over which one has little or no
control. In some families, continual evaluation and
criticism of performance--one's own and others--is a
tradition. Any natural tendency to self-evaluate
likely will be inflated. Depression and academic
underachievement may be increased.
Sometimes educational misplacement causes the gifted
youngster to feel caught in a slow motion world.
Depression may result because the child feels caught in
an unchangeable situation.
Family Relations. Families particularly influence the
development of social and emotional competence. When
problems occur, it is not because parents consciously
decide to create difficulties for gifted children. It is
because parents lack information about gifted
children, or lack support for appropriate parenting, or
are attempting to cope with their own unresolved
problems (which may stem from their experiences with
being gifted).
Back to the Table of Contents
Preventing Problems
Reach out to Parents. Parents are particularly
important in preventing social or emotional problems.
Teaching, no matter how excellent or supportive, can
seldom counteract inappropriate parenting.
Supportive family environments, on the other hand, can
counteract unhappy school experiences. Parents need
information if they are to nurture well and to be wise
advocates for their children.
Focus on Parents of Young Children. Problems are best
prevented by involving parents when children are young.
Parents particularly must understand characteristics
that may make gifted children seem different or
difficult.
Educate and Involve Health-Care and Other
Professionals. Concentrated efforts should be made to
involve such professionals in state and local meetings
and in continuing education programs concerning gifted
children. Pediatricians, psychologists, and other
caregivers such as day-care providers typically have
received little training about gifted children, and
therefore can provide little assistance to parents
(Webb & Kleine, 1993).
Use Educational Flexibility. Gifted children require
different and more flexible educational experiences.
When the children come from multicultural or low-income
families, educational flexibility and reaching out may
be particularly necessary. Seven flexibly paced
educational options, relatively easy to implement in
most school settings (Cox, Daniel & Boston, 1985) are:
early entrance; grade skipping; advanced level
courses; compacted courses; continuous progress in the
regular classroom; concurrent enrollment in advanced
classes; and credit by examination. These options are
based on competence and demonstrated ability, rather
than on arbitrary age groupings.
Establish Parent Discussion Groups. Parents of gifted
children typically have few opportunities to talk with
other parents of gifted children. Discussion groups
provide opportunities to "swap parenting recipes" and
child-rearing experiences. Such experiences provide
perspective as well as specific information (Webb &
DeVries, 1993).
Back to the Table of Contents
References
Adderholt-Elliott, M. (1989). Perfectionism: What's so bad about being
good?
Minneapolis: Free Spirit.
Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted. New York: Merrill.
Cox, J., Daniel, N., & Boston, B.O. (1985). Educating able
learners: Programs
and promising practices. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Halsted, J.W. (1994). Some of my best friends are books: Guiding gifted
readers. Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
Kerr, B. (1991). A handbook for counseling the gifted and talented.
Alexandria,
VA: American Association for Counseling and Development.
Kerr, B.A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women. Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology
Press.
Kleine, P.A., & Webb, J.T. (1992). Community links as resources. In
Challenges
in gifted education: Developing potential and investing in knowledge for the
21st century (pp. 63-72). Columbus, OH: Ohio Department of Education.
Powell, P.M., & Haden, T. (1984). The intellectual and psychosocial
nature of
extreme giftedness. Roeper Review, 6(3), 131-133.
Seagoe, M. (1974). Some learning characteristics of gifted children. In R.
Martinson, The identification of the gifted and talented. Ventura, CA: Office
of the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools.
Webb, J.T., & DeVries, A.R. (1993). Training manual for
facilitators of SENG
model guided discussion groups for parents of talented children. Dayton: Ohio
Psychology Press.
Webb, J.T., & Kleine, P.A. (1993). Assessing gifted and talented
children. In J. Culbertson and D. Willis (Eds.), Testing young children (pp. 383-407).
Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Whitmore, J.R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict and
underachievement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Whitmore, J.R., & Maker, C.J. (1985). Intellectual giftedness in
disabled persons. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
Back to the Table of Contents
Credits
James T. Webb, Ph.D. is Professor at the School of Professional Psychology,
Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio. Professor Webb directs the SENG
(Supporting Emotional Needs of Gifted) program which provides diagnostic and
counseling services for gifted children and their families and trains doctoral
psychologists. Many of the ideas in this digest are derived from Webb, J.T.,
Meckstroth, E.A., and Tolan, S.S. (1982). Guiding the gifted child. Dayton:
Ohio Psychology Press.
1994
ERIC EC Digest #E527
The ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education; The Council for
Exceptional Children
This publication was prepared with funding from the Office of Educational
Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, under contract no.
RR93002005. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect
the positions or policies of OERI or the Department of Education.
Back to the Top
|